热带病与寄生虫学 ›› 2021, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (4): 210-.

• 防治研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

宿州市新冠肺炎疫情不同防控阶段核酸检测结果分析

胡雪影,张玲,李垚,陈樱玮,赵娟娟
  

  1. 宿州市疾病预防控制中心,安徽 宿州 234000
  • 出版日期:2021-08-20 发布日期:2021-08-26
  • 作者简介:胡雪影, 女,硕士,副主任技师,研究方向:微生物实验室检测 。 E-mail:huying_1979@ 163. com

Analysis of the nucleic acid detection findings of COVID-19 in different prevention stage in Suzhou City

HU Xue-ying,ZHANG Ling,LI Yao,CHEN Ying-wei,ZHAO Juan-juan   

  1. Suzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Suzhou 234000,Anhui Province,China
  • Online:2021-08-20 Published:2021-08-26

摘要: 目的 在新冠肺炎疫情不同阶段采取不同核酸检测策略,比较新冠病毒核酸检测结果差异,为调整防控措施提供科学依据方法 2020 1 22 —2 29 日采集宿州市重点人群的咽拭子和痰液样本,利用实时荧光RT-PCR 法检测新型冠状病毒核酸,比较不同防控阶段新冠病毒核酸检测结果差异结果 采集重点人群 704 人的 1 182 份样本,其中 46 人的 59 份样本检测出新冠病毒核酸,样本阳性检出率 4. 99%(59 / 1 182),最终确诊 41 例新冠肺炎病例、5 例无症状感染者新冠病毒核酸样本阳性检出率最高阶段为疫情初期,高达 14. 81%(12 / 81),其次是第二阶段(6. 17%,24 / 389)和第三阶段(5. 71%,22 / 385),最低为第四阶段(0. 31%,1 / 327)。 样本阳性检出率最高人群为有湖北省旅居史人员,10. 13%(31 / 306),其次是密切接触者 3. 85%(28 / 727),本地发热门诊留观患者中未检出阳性结论 宿州市在新冠肺炎疫情发展不同阶段及时调整核酸检测策略,为有效控制疫情的发展提供强有力的保障;在加强对中高风险地区人员密切接触者等重点人群检测时,应尽可能增加样本采集次数,减少漏检

关键词: 新型冠状病毒, 核酸检测, 宿州市

Abstract: Objective To compare the diversity of nucleic acid testing findings of COVID-19 in different prevention stages for scientific evidences to develop reasonable prevention and control strategies. Methods Pharyngeal swabs and sputum samples were obtained in the key population in Suzhou from January 22 to February 29,2020,and detected for the nucleic acid specific to COVID-19 using real-time RT-PCR. Then the testing results were compared among the samples tested in different prevention stages. Results A total of 1 182 samples were collected from 704 suspected subjects,in whom positive novel coronavirus nucleic acid was found in 46 subjects out of the 59 samples. The positive detection rate was 4. 99% (59 /1 182). Forty-one were finally confirmed as COVID-19,and 5 as asymptomatic infection. The highest positive rate of nucleic acid for COVID-19 was 14. 81% (12 / 81) in the early stage of the epidemic,followed by 6. 17% (24 / 389) in the second stage and 5. 71% (22 / 385) in the third stage,and the lowest positive rate was in the fourth stage(0. 31%,1 / 327) . The highest positive rate was seen in subjects with history of travelling or short-term stay in Hubei Province(10. 13%,31 / 306), followed by close contacts(3. 85%,28 / 727). Positive nucleic acid was not detected in local residents in observation at the outpatient due to fever. Conclusion Nucleic acid detection strategy was timely adjusted at different stages of COVID-19 endemic in Suzhou,which has ensured effective implementation of the prevention and control measures. However,sampling frequencies for the nucleic acid should be increased as many as possible in the key population including those from medium and high risk areas or close contacts,so as to reduce missed detection.

Key words: COVID-19, Nucleic acid detection, Suzhou City

中图分类号: