热带病与寄生虫学 ›› 2025, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (3): 176-182.doi: 10.20199/j.issn.1672-2302.2025.03.009

• 实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

淡色库蚊表皮蛋白对残杀威抗性的蛋白组学研究

张辉红1,2(), 徐颢源1, 李文璇1,2, 郭秀霞1, 程鹏1, 王海防1, 刘丽娟1, 张崇星1,2()   

  1. 1.山东省寄生虫病防治研究所,山东第一医科大学(山东省医学科学院),山东济宁 272033
    2.山东第一医科大学(山东省医学科学院)公共卫生与健康管理学院
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-06 出版日期:2025-06-20 发布日期:2025-08-08
  • 通信作者: 张崇星,E-mail: chongxingzhang@aliyun.com
  • 作者简介:张辉红,女,硕士在读,研究方向:蚊媒防制研究。E-mail: huihongzh22@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    山东省自然科学基金项目(ZR2021MH122)

Study on the epidermal adaptability mechanism of Culex pipiens pallens resistance to propoxur by comparative proteomics

ZHANG Huihong1,2(), XU Haoyuan1, LI Wenxuan1,2, GUO Xiuxia1, CHENG Peng1, WANG Haifang1, LIU Lijuan1, ZHANG Chongxing1,2()   

  1. 1. Shandong Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jining 272033, Shandong Province, China
    2. School of Public Health and Health Management, Shandong First Medical University &Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences
  • Received:2024-12-06 Online:2025-06-20 Published:2025-08-08
  • Contact: ZHANG Chongxing, E-mail: chongxingzhang@aliyun.com

摘要:

目的 探究淡色库蚊对残杀威抗性的表皮蛋白适应机制,明确差异表达蛋白在抗性与敏感株系抗性形成中的作用。方法 以实验室淡色库蚊敏感株系为亲本,连续20代残杀威筛选培育抗性株系,收集抗性与敏感株淡色库蚊各发育阶段样本。采用同位素标记相对和绝对定量技术(isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification, iTRAQ)定量分析蛋白组,利用COG、GO和KEGG数据库进行功能注释及通路富集分析,并通过平行反应监测验证关键蛋白表达。结果 共鉴定出156个差异表达蛋白(59个上调,97个下调),淡色库蚊抗性株系中表皮结构成分蛋白(B0WIY4、B0W0L1)、几丁质结合蛋白及幼虫表皮蛋白显著上调;细胞骨架相关蛋白(B0WY76)、能量代谢蛋白(丙酮酸脱氢酶B0XA87)及核糖体蛋白(B0WQU6)显著下调。平行反应监测验证了肌动蛋白(B0WY76)等11类蛋白表达。结论 淡色库蚊对残杀威抗性与表皮蛋白差异表达和细胞骨架重构引起的表皮结构改变密切相关,这种结构改变可能延缓杀虫剂表皮渗透,从而增强对残杀威的抗性。

关键词: 淡色库蚊, 残杀威, 抗性机制, 表皮蛋白, 蛋白质组学

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the potential cuticular protein adaptation mechanisms of Culex pipiens pallens resistance to propoxur for characterizing the functional roles of differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) in conferring the resistance between resistant and susceptible strains. Methods A propoxur-resistant strain was generated through 20 generations of selective pressure from a laboratory-maintained susceptible strain. Samples spanning multiple developmental stages from both strains were subjected to quantitative proteomic profiling using isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification (iTRAQ). Subsequent functional annotation and pathway enrichment analyses were performed by means of COG, GO, and KEGG databases, followed by targeted validation of pivotal proteins via parallel reaction monitoring (PRM). Results A total of 156 DEPs, comprising 59 upregulated and 97 downregulated proteins, were identified. Cuticular structural components (B0WIY4, B0W0L1), chitin-binding proteins, and larval cuticular proteins exhibited marked upregulation in the resistant strain, whereas cytoskeleton-associated proteins (B0WY76), energy metabolism regulators (pyruvate dehydrogenase B0XA87), and ribosomal proteins (B0WQU6) were significantly downregulated. PRM analysis confirmed the expression trends of 11 representative proteins, including actin (B0WY76). Conclusion The resistance of Culex pipiens pallens to propoxur is closely related to the structural alterations of the cuticle caused by differential expression of cuticular proteins and cytoskeletal remodeling. These alterations likely impede insecticide penetration through the cuticle, thereby enhancing propoxur resistance.

Key words: Culex pipiens pallens, Propoxur, Resistant mechanism, Cuticular protein, Proteomics

中图分类号: